6 posts across Judging AI
Unit 42 tested 685,339 prompts and found 2.1 million AI-generated URLs — 13,229 already live and malicious. In one case, researchers predicted which domain an AI would hallucinate. Twenty-three days later, an attacker registered it and deployed a phishing kit.
4 min readA Derbyshire officer was removed from duty and placed under criminal investigation for allegedly using AI to fabricate evidential material — the UK's first criminal case of its kind. The failure mode that caused it appears in professional documents every week.
5 min readFluency and accuracy are unrelated in AI output, and human error-detection is tuned almost entirely to fluency. Here are the tells that survive that mismatch, and the ones that don't.
5 min readFigures are the highest-risk thing AI produces and the thing people check least, because a number looks like a fact. Four checks that take under a minute each, and the one that catches the most.
5 min readTwo South African officials were suspended after 102 of 148 citations in a Cabinet-approved report were AI-fabricated. Nature retracted a 504-citation paper on the same day. The accountability gap between 'AI wrote it' and 'I submitted it' is closing. Here's what you do about it.
4 min readA law firm sent 42 fabricated citations to a judge. A newspaper published a quote that was never said. In every case the output looked right, because looking right is what these systems are reliably good at.
5 min readWe use one cookie to keep you signed in — that one isn't optional. Separately, we'd like to record which drills people finish and where they get stuck, so we can fix the parts that don't teach. No ad networks, no selling anything on. Privacy policy.